A sponsored AMBCrypto “Press Release” argues recent crypto price swings are a structural feature of always-on markets, rapid information absorption, and liquidity mechanics. The page explicitly flags the content as paid and says it should not be treated as news or advice.
Key Takeaways
- The page is labeled “Press Release” and carries a disclaimer stating: “This is a paid post and should not be treated as news/advice.”
- A “Monthly Market Insights” reference dated 30 June 2025 is used to support a claim that global crypto market value rose 10.3% in May 2025 after “several drastic changes” early in the month.
- The post asserts early-2025 industry data showed the “leading global exchange” often exceeded 30% of worldwide spot trading volume, implying faster price adjustment.
- Richard Teng is quoted (dated 21 Nov 2025 in the post) describing volatility as cyclical across asset classes and calling consolidation “healthy for the industry.”
The volatility framework is being marketed, not reported. The AMBCrypto page is explicitly labeled a “Press Release,” and it includes a paid-post disclaimer telling readers not to treat it as news or advice.
That labeling matters for traders because the piece is positioning a narrative lens: crypto’s sharp moves are presented as a predictable outcome of market design. The post’s core claim is that digital assets reprice quickly because they trade 24/7 and absorb information in real time, from technology updates to macroeconomic indicators, without the dampening effect of market hours.
The post also gestures at microstructure as the amplifier. In practice, that means the speed of information is only half the story. The other half is whether liquidity is actually there when the market tries to move.
The Post’s Anchors: 10.3% May 2025 Market-Cap Rise and the Teng Consolidation Quote
To normalize volatility as cyclical rather than exceptional, the post leans on two anchors and one quote.
First, it cites “Monthly Market Insights” dated 30 June 2025 to claim the value of the global cryptocurrency market rose 10.3% during May 2025, after “several drastic changes” earlier in the month. The underlying report is not provided in the material, so the figure functions more as rhetorical ballast than verifiable market data in this context.
Second, it quotes Binance CEO Richard Teng in a broader industry comment dated 21 November 2025: “As with any asset class, there are always different cycles and volatility. What you’re seeing is not only happening to crypto prices. Any consolidation is actually healthy for the industry, for the industry to take a breather, find its feet.”
Together, those elements frame drawdowns and rebounds as part of a regime, not a one-off shock.
Exchange Concentration and Thin Order Books: Why Medium Trades Can Move Mid-Caps
The post’s most tradable claim is structural: volatility can be amplified by continuous information absorption plus liquidity constraints, especially where order books are thin.
It argues that independent industry data from early 2025 “consistently indicated” the “leading global exchange” often surpassed 30% of worldwide spot trading volume. Spot volume here refers to assets traded for immediate delivery, not . If one venue really is clearing that much of global spot flow, price discovery can become more sensitive to order-flow shifts on that venue. The catch is the post does not name the exchange or the dataset, which limits how much weight traders should put on the exact threshold.
On the liquidity side, the post points to order-book depth. An order book is the live stack of bids and offers near the current price. In a thin order book, there are fewer orders close to price, so even medium-size trades can create outsized slippage. The post says this effect is more apparent in mid-tier tokens, where depth is typically weaker and market makers can pull liquidity quickly when conditions deteriorate.
Trader Checklist From the Post: Volume, Momentum, Macro Timing, and Liquidity Conditions
The post’s forward-looking checklist maps cleanly to a volatility-regime dashboard.
Spot-volume concentration is one. The real-time question is whether any single exchange sustains something like a 30%+ share of global spot volume, and whether that share rises during high-volatility sessions.
Liquidity conditions are the second. Order-book depth and slippage in mid-cap tokens during fast moves are a direct proxy for the “thin book” conditions the post highlights.
Catalyst timing is the third. The post’s framing implies outsized moves should cluster around macro releases and major protocol or technology updates, consistent with “real-time information absorption.”
Finally, the post’s May 2025 example implies a pattern to monitor at the index level: sharp early-month drawdowns followed by rebounds that still leave the month positive, like the claimed +10.3% May 2025 outcome after early “drastic changes.”
I treat this as a microstructure reminder wrapped in marketing. The paid-post disclaimer is explicit, so the volatility thesis should be handled as a narrative framework, not a verified market report.
The threshold that matters is whether liquidity and venue concentration line up with the story in live conditions. If one exchange is truly dominating spot flow and mid-cap books are thin enough that medium trades routinely gap price, the setup starts to look structural rather than narrative-driven, and volatility becomes a function of plumbing, not headlines.
Sources
btc$72,911+1.55%
eth$2,243.75+2.28%
usdt$1+0.03%
xrp$1.35+0.79%
bnb$606.75+0.96%
usdc$1+0.00%
sol$84.49+1.16%
trx$0.32-0.25%
doge$0.09+0.72%
ada$0.25-0.12%
bch$440.84+0.44%
link$9.03+0.84%
xlm$0.15-0.68%
ltc$54.69+0.28%
avax$9.28-0.15%
hbar$0.09-0.51%
sui$0.94+0.20%
dot$1.28-1.00%
uni$3.15+1.13%
etc$8.37-1.30%
algo$0.11-2.11%
atom$1.78-2.01%
fil$0.9-0.74%
vet$0.01-0.37%
