
Chair Mike Selig also launched an “innovation tracker” spanning crypto, AI systems, and prediction markets.
The CFTC has staffed the first slate of its new Innovation Task Force and put a public “innovation tracker” behind it. The messaging points toward clearer coordination on crypto market structure, but the jurisdictional split with the SEC still hinges on whether the CLARITY Act becomes law.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission has disclosed the first roster for its Innovation Task Force, a new internal build-out positioned as part of a broader regulatory-clarity push for digital assets. The task force was launched on March 24 by CFTC Chair Mike Selig, who appointed Michael Passalacqua to lead it. Passalacqua is described as Selig’s senior advisor at the agency.
Selig cast the effort in operational terms, not theory. “The Innovation Task Force brings together a leading team that exhibits deep expertise and an enthusiastic commitment to deliver clear rules of the road for American innovators,” he said.
For traders, the immediate signal is process and visibility. Pairing a dedicated task force with a public-facing tracker reads like an attempt to centralize workstreams and make the CFTC’s innovation agenda easier to monitor in real time.
The CFTC named five initial members who skew heavily toward legal, policy, and market-structure experience.
They are Hank Balaban, described as a former Latham & Watkins crypto lawyer, and Eugene Gonzalez IV, described as an ex-Sidley blockchain lawyer. Sam Canavos was identified as an ex-Patomak advisor spanning crypto and prediction markets. The list also includes Mark Fajfar, described as a CFTC legal veteran, and Dina Moussa, described as special counsel in the CFTC’s Market Participants Division.
The composition matters because it suggests the early output is more likely to be interpretive guidance, coordination, and framework design than immediate rule text. It is a staffing move that can shape how quickly the agency can translate “clarity” into documents market participants can actually cite.
Alongside the staffing announcement, Selig introduced a CFTC “innovation tracker” that aggregates work under his tenure intended to “advance regulatory clarity, market integrity, and responsible technological progress.” The tracker lists three focus areas: crypto and blockchain, artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, and contracts and prediction markets.
That last category is the tell. By explicitly putting prediction markets on the same innovation dashboard as crypto, the CFTC is keeping event contracts in the same regulatory conversation as digital- market structure. That linkage can matter for venues and intermediaries that touch both, especially as product design and listing decisions increasingly depend on how regulators frame permissible contracts.
The agency build-out lands amid a wider push for digital-asset clarity under the Donald Trump administration, but the hard jurisdictional handoff remains unresolved. The framing ties the SEC vs. CFTC role split to whether the CLARITY Act passes and becomes law.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins has publicly aligned with the CFTC on implementation readiness. In a post on X, Atkins said the SEC and CFTC are “ready to implement the CLARITY Act,” adding: “It's time for Congress to future-proof against rogue regulators and advance comprehensive market structure legislation to President Trump's desk.”
Until Congress moves, near-term expectations should be set around guidance and coordination rather than a definitive rewrite of oversight.
I treat this as a market-structure signal, not a policy victory lap. A staffed task force plus an “innovation tracker” is the CFTC making its workstreams legible, which tends to pull liquidity venues and issuers into a more formal consultation orbit even before any statute changes.
The threshold that matters is whether the tracker starts producing concrete deliverables like staff advisories, public roundtables, or written guidance that exchanges can operationalize, especially around crypto listings and prediction-market style contracts. If that cadence shows up while the CLARITY Act timeline stays fuzzy, the setup starts to look structural rather than narrative-driven, because unified SEC/CFTC messaging can reduce compliance uncertainty even without a full jurisdictional handoff.