Warsh ethics filing lists crypto and AI exposures with

Kevin Warsh, President Donald Trump’s pick to replace Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chair, filed an ethics disclosure listing crypto- and AI-linked investments but left value ranges blank for several of them. The filing lands with Powell’s May 15 term end approaching and no publicly posted Senate Banking Committee hearing date.

Key Takeaways

Kevin Warsh filed a US Office of Government Ethics asset disclosure ahead of a Senate confirmation process to lead the Federal Reserve.
Total assets were reported at more than $100 million, while several crypto- and AI-linked items in the filing listed no value ranges.
The disclosure named Excepted Investment Funds tied to Compound, Dapper Labs, and Kinetic, alongside AI companies including Delphi, Conversion, Factory, and Glue.
The largest disclosed positions included more than $50 million in the Juggernaut Fund and more than $10 million in consulting-fee income from Duquesne Family Office.

Warsh’s OGE Filing Puts Crypto and AI Exposures on the Record

Kevin Warsh, President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Federal Reserve and replace Chair Jerome Powell, submitted an asset disclosure to the US Office of Government Ethics as his nomination moves toward Senate consideration.

For macro-sensitive crypto traders, the immediate signal is procedural rather than price-mechanical. The nomination is active, but the Senate Banking Committee had not publicly announced a hearing as of the story’s Tuesday reference, leaving timing uncertainty into Powell’s scheduled May 15 term end.

The filing also introduces a clean headline-risk vector. Warsh reported more than $100 million in total assets, but several crypto- and AI-linked investments were listed without value ranges, creating a transparency gap that can keep the confirmation narrative noisy even before any policy stance is clarified.

What’s Listed: EIF Links to Compound and Dapper Labs, Plus Big-Dollar Line Items

Warsh’s disclosure listed “Excepted Investment Funds” (EIFs) tied to Compound, Dapper Labs, and Kinetic. The same filing also named AI companies including Delphi, Conversion, Factory, and Glue, among others.

Those labels matter because they put crypto-adjacent exposure directly into the confirmation record, even if the document does not size the positions. In practice, that is enough to keep conflict-of-interest and crypto-policy questions in play during the run-up to any hearing.

On the big-dollar side, the largest disclosed line items included more than $50 million in the Juggernaut Fund. The disclosure also reported more than $10 million in income from consulting fees for Duquesne Family Office, the investment firm of Stanley Druckenmiller.

Why Some Value Ranges Are Missing — and What the OGE Rules Say

The filing did not include value ranges for several of the crypto and AI investments, and the reason for the omissions was not established in the source material.

The only explicit rule detail provided is that Office of Government Ethics rules do not require reporting for assets under $1,000. That leaves two live possibilities traders should keep separate: the positions could be below the reporting threshold, or the missing ranges could reflect some other reporting treatment tied to how the holdings are structured or categorized.

Either way, the gap is the point. When a Fed chair nominee’s disclosure shows more than $100 million in assets but leaves blanks on politically sensitive categories, it increases the odds of follow-up questions, supplemental filings, or narrative-driven volatility around the confirmation calendar.

Signals to Watch for Fed chair nominee discloses crypto, AI

The first market-moving update is simply scheduling. A public notice of a Senate Banking Committee hearing date, or clearer timing on a committee vote, would reduce uncertainty. Reports referenced in the story suggested lawmakers could vote as early as next week, but no official date was posted.

A second catalyst would be any amended or supplemental OGE disclosure that adds value ranges for the crypto/AI-linked items or clarifies why ranges were omitted.

Powell’s May 15 term-end milestone is the hard calendar anchor in the story context. The practical question is whether confirmation steps compress into that window or drift beyond it.

Finally, traders should watch for nominations to fill regulator vacancies. The story described the SEC as operating with three of five commissioners (all Republicans) and the CFTC with a sole commissioner, Michael Selig, with four slots unfilled.

Macro and Policy Risk Traders Should Map to This Nomination

I treat this as a timing and governance story first, and a crypto story second. The immediate market signal is that the process is still unscheduled in public view, even as Powell’s May 15 term end sits on the calendar. That kind of uncertainty tends to express itself through headlines and positioning, not through a clean, tradable policy repricing.

The threshold that matters is whether the missing value ranges get resolved before the committee locks in a hearing and vote path. If the disclosure stays ambiguous while the SEC and CFTC remain understaffed and a market structure bill remains stalled since July 2025, the setup starts to look structural rather than narrative-driven, because the same small set of decision-makers would be carrying outsized influence over digital-asset policy at the exact moment Fed leadership is in flux.

Sources

US Office of Government Ethics